Arguement against minimum drug sentencing

One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers.

In the United States, for example, these laws were first enacted when the Boggs Act of was passed. In particular, defendants with prior drug felonies are often subject to harsh mandatory minimums, but the prosecutor can exercise his discretion to not file a prior felony information.

Ryan pledged earlier this year to give floor time to a package of criminal justice bills being passed through the House Judiciary Committee. For this might be substituted elements of the press in Australia.

This is so whether the inconsistency is in sentencing, or differential police or prosecution practices". For a first offence the mandatory sentence was 14 days imprisonment, for a second offence, not less than 90 days, and not less than 12 months for a third offence.

By Blackstone estimated that there were capital statutes in force. These defendants, and others like them, occupy a space at the deadly intersection of illicit drugs and violent crime.

Wrong again, Kerik wrote. Senate Inquiry at pp. Williscroft [] Vic R. Priority for Children in the Legal Process. In response to prison overcrowdingthe law was changed in to reduce the number of such sentences being passed, by restoring judicial discretion and abolishing the presumption that a repeat offender is dangerous.

The Bill of Rights prohibition on excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments conveys the same notion. Interviews with judges, lawyers and probation officers at twelve sites showed that heavy majorities of judges, defence counsel and probation officers disliked mandatory penalties; prosecutors are about evenly divided.

However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. It was only during the 19th Century that such penalties gave way to a more enlightened system of justice in which the judiciary was given discretion as to the penalties which could be imposed.

In all civilised countries, in all ages that has been the main purpose of punishment and it still continues so. For now though mandatory sentencing is in place and I really do hope, all reservations withstanding, that it helps make Sydney a safer place to be tonight.

They are also likely to result in higher prison costs, with more offenders being sentenced to imprisonment, and for longer periods. There will inevitably be cases where offenders receive excessively harsh sentences. He was sentenced to four years in federal prison in for tax fraud and making false statements.

But all purposes may be reduced under the single heading of the protection of society, the protection of the community from crime. It was clearly an unpalatable conclusion, with at least two members of the Court Angel and Mildren JJ describing the mandatory provisions as leading to unjust sentences.

Other Race offenders had the next highest rates How well is the status quo working. Retribution, deterrence and reformation are related, however, to the specific conduct in respect of which the offender is sentenced.

In the year following the introduction of mandatory sentencing, imprisonment rates of juveniles increased by 53 per cent. The bill also calls for judges to have discretion on whether terminally ill or permanently incapacitated inmates can be transferred out of prison for treatment.

Mandatory Sentencing for One-Punch Attacks: Pros and Cons

The reform suffers from one main defect: One oft-quoted example is that those who use, sell, or produce drugs that are often used by African-Americans are often given harsher penalties than those who deal with drugs that are often used by the white population.

The research contains a succinct list of common arguments for and against these laws: Between and40 states took action to ease drug laws, according to the Pew Research Center.

The Member for Lake Macquarie also raised the issue of possibly unjust sentences stemming from the decision: Sinceimprisonment rates in the Northern Territory, particularly of indigenous children and women, have soared.

Mandatory Sentencing Rights and Wrongs, p. Soon after, in Trenerry v. In review of these policies regarding the applications of sentencing, the policy decisions are those that dictate what considerations should affect punishment. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

The laws help to reduce crime by acting as a stronger deterrent to would-be offenders. The third decision judges make in discretionary schemes is how to apply the sentencing policies to the particular facts.

Moreover, as the Senate Committee inquiring into the Human Rights Mandatory Sentencing of Juvenile Offenders Bill observed, the introduction of mandatory sentencing in both Western Australia and the Northern Territory was "a direct response by government to community concern about home burglary Western Australia and a number of property crimes Northern Territory ".

Research indicates that mandatory minimum sentencing effectively shifts discretion from judges to the prosecutors. Argument against mandatory minimum drug sentencing There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing.

Sep 12,  · GOP Aide Urges Republicans to Oppose Criminal Justice Reform Because 'Drug Trafficking is a Violent Crime' As votes loom on a package of. Arguement Against Minimum Drug Sentencing Argument against mandatory minimum drug sentencing There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing/5(1).

Pros and cons of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Arguement Against Minimum Drug Sentencing Argument against mandatory minimum drug sentencing There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing.

Mandatory sentencing

However there are more arguments against/5(1). The U.S. Senate is considering two bills that would revise the federal sentencing laws in the case of mandatory minimum sentences.

Arguement against minimum drug sentencing
Rated 5/5 based on 32 review
Pros and cons of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences essay paper